You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A social cost-benefit analysis of meat taxation and a fruit and vegetables subsidy for a healthy and sustainable food consumption in the Netherlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-08590-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marlin J. Broeks, Sander Biesbroek, Eelco A. B. Over, Paul F. van Gils, Ido Toxopeus, Marja H. Beukers, Elisabeth H. M. Temme |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 32 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 8% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Sweden | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 48 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 97 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 7% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 88 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 94 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#327,840
of 25,282,542 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#291
of 16,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,847
of 390,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#8
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,282,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.