You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mirroring everyday clinical practice in clinical trial design: a new concept to improve the external validity of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials in the pharmacological treatment of major depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-67 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emanuel Severus, Florian Seemüller, Michael Berger, Sandra Dittmann, Michael Obermeier, Andrea Pfennig, Michael Riedel, Sophia Frangou, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Michael Bauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,272,728
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,261
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,220
of 178,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#39
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.