You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/ar3468 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachelle Buchbinder, Roy Batterham, Gerald Elsworth, Clermont E Dionne, Emma Irvin, Richard H Osborne |
Abstract |
While the importance and magnitude of the burden of low back pain upon the individual is well recognized, a systematic understanding of the impact of the condition on individuals is currently hampered by the lack of an organized understanding of what aspects of a person's life are affected and the lack of comprehensive measures for these effects. The aim of the present study was to develop a conceptual and measurement model of the overall burden of low back pain from the individual's perspective using a validity-driven approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 56% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Other | 26 | 24% |
Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
Psychology | 10 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,204,729
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,481
of 3,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,186
of 143,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.