You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Human-centered design as a guide to intervention planning for non-communicable diseases: the BIGPIC study from Western Kenya
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-020-05199-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudia L. Leung, Mackenzie Naert, Benjamin Andama, Rae Dong, David Edelman, Carol Horowitz, Peninah Kiptoo, Simon Manyara, Winnie Matelong, Esther Matini, Violet Naanyu, Sarah Nyariki, Sonak Pastakia, Thomas Valente, Valentin Fuster, Gerald S. Bloomfield, Jemima Kamano, Rajesh Vedanthan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
India | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
Researcher | 19 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Unknown | 54 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 17% |
Unknown | 58 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,817,825
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#630
of 8,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,762
of 420,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#18
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.