↓ Skip to main content

Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-01004-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Karen R. Steingart, Andrea C. Tricco, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, David Kaunelis, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Susan Baxter, Patrick M. Bossuyt, José Ignacio Emparanza, Javier Zamora

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Librarian 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Engineering 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,060,474
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#297
of 2,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,976
of 389,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#17
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.