↓ Skip to main content

Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12910-020-00479-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleanor Bailey, Charlotte Mühlmann, Simon Rice, Maja Nedeljkovic, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Lasse Sander, Alison L. Calear, Philip J. Batterham, Jo Robinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 20 10%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 91 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Unspecified 20 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 93 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,213,990
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#436
of 1,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,561
of 391,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.