↓ Skip to main content

Pressure during decision making of continuous sedation in end-of-life situations in Dutch general practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pressure during decision making of continuous sedation in end-of-life situations in Dutch general practice
Published in
BMC Primary Care, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-13-68
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco H Blanker, Marlies Koerhuis-Roessink, Siebe J Swart, Wouter WA Zuurmond, Agnes van der Heide, Roberto SGM Perez, Judith AC Rietjens

Abstract

Little is known about pressure from patients or relatives on physician's decision making of continuous palliative sedation. We aim to describe experienced pressure by general practitioners (GPs) in cases of continuous sedation after the introduction of the Dutch practice guideline, using a questionnaire survey.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,255,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,201
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,074
of 177,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#24
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.