You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Citizen and stakeholder led priority setting for long-term care research: identifying research priorities within the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) Program
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00199-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephanie A. Chamberlain, Carole A. Estabrooks, Janice M. Keefe, Matthias Hoben, Charlotte Berendonk, Kyle Corbett, Andrea Gruneir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 13 | 68% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 19% |
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,567,759
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#222
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,304
of 391,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.