↓ Skip to main content

Monoclonal antibody therapy for Kawasaki disease: a protocol for systematic reviews and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monoclonal antibody therapy for Kawasaki disease: a protocol for systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0236-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Osamu Nomura, Sayaka Fukuda, Erika Ota, Hiroshi Ono, Akira Ishiguro, Tohru Kobayashi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,549,415
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,214
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,699
of 301,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.