You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Application of the matched nested case-control design to the secondary analysis of trial data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01007-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher Partlett, Nigel J. Hall, Alison Leaf, Edmund Juszczak, Louise Linsell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 35 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 37 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#13,665,227
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,310
of 2,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,469
of 388,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#64
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.