You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of cine CMR imaging at 0.55 T and 1.5 T
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00618-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W. Patricia Bandettini, Sujata M. Shanbhag, Christine Mancini, Delaney R. McGuirt, Peter Kellman, Hui Xue, Jennifer L. Henry, Margaret Lowery, Swee Lay Thein, Marcus Y. Chen, Adrienne E. Campbell-Washburn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 51% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,494,955
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#40
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,451
of 425,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.