You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What approaches exist to evaluate the effectiveness of UK-relevant natural flood management measures? A systematic map protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-020-00192-x |
| Authors |
Angela Connelly, Andrew Snow, Jeremy Carter, Rachel Lauwerijssen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,553,484
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#267
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,712
of 393,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.