You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk factors for revision of total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12891-016-1025-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L.L. Jasper, C. A. Jones, J. Mollins, S. L. Pohar, L. A. Beaupre |
| Abstract |
In spite of the increasing incidence of total knee arthroplasties (TKA), evidence is limited regarding risk factors for revision. The objective of this scoping review was to identify and assess demographic, surgical and health services factors that may increase the risk for revision surgery following TKA. A scoping review was undertaken following an electronic search in MEDLINE (1990 to December 2013), CINAHL (to December 2013), EMBASE (1990 to December 2013) and Web of Science (1990 to December 2013). Of the 4460 articles screened, 42 were included of which 26 articles were based on registry data. Increased risk of revision was associated with demographic factors (younger age, African American), surgical factors related to the primary TKA (uncemented components, implant malalignment, increased surgery duration), and health services (low volume hospitals). Identifying emerging trends in characteristics of those requiring revision following TKA can help identify those at risk and allocate appropriate resources. Further primary clinical articles on risk factors for revision of TKA are necessary to ensure maximal function and lifespan following TKAs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 58 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2016.
All research outputs
#13,778,431
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,989
of 4,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,321
of 298,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#48
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.