↓ Skip to main content

Muscle recruitment patterns during the prone leg extension

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Muscle recruitment patterns during the prone leg extension
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-5-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory J Lehman, Duane Lennon, Brian Tresidder, Ben Rayfield, Michael Poschar

Abstract

The prone leg extension (PLE) is a clinical test used to evaluate the function of the lumbopelvis. It has been theorized that a normal and consistent pattern of muscle activation exists. Previous research has found two contradictory patterns of muscle activation during PLE in normal individuals. One study shows an almost simultaneous activation of the lower erector spinae and hamstring muscle group with a delayed activation of the gluteus maximus, while the second describes the order of activation being ipsilateral erector spinae (to the leg being extended), hamstrings, contralateral erector spinae and gluteus maximus. Due to the different conclusions from these two studies and the lack of quantified muscle onset times, expressed in absolute time this study attempted to quantify the muscle onset times (in milliseconds) during the prone leg extension, while noting if a consistent order of activation exists and whether a timing relationship also exists between the gluteus maximus and contralateral latissimus dorsi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Chile 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 155 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 50 30%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 35%
Sports and Recreations 37 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 32 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,555,957
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#506
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,060
of 132,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.