You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The potential of anti-malarial compounds derived from African medicinal plants, part II: a pharmacological evaluation of non-alkaloids and non-terpenoids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fidele Ntie-Kang, Pascal Amoa Onguéné, Lydia L Lifongo, Jean Claude Ndom, Wolfgang Sippl, Luc Meva’a Mbaze |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 289 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 51 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 50 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 32 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Unknown | 93 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,609,465
of 23,208,901 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,537
of 5,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,430
of 222,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#59
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,208,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.