↓ Skip to main content

Predominant risk factors for tick-borne co-infections in hunting dogs from the USA

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predominant risk factors for tick-borne co-infections in hunting dogs from the USA
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13071-020-04118-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurayi Mahachi, Eric Kontowicz, Bryan Anderson, Angela J. Toepp, Adam Leal Lima, Mandy Larson, Geneva Wilson, Tara Grinnage-Pulley, Carolyne Bennett, Marie Ozanne, Michael Anderson, Hailie Fowler, Molly Parrish, Jill Saucier, Phyllis Tyrrell, Zachary Palmer, Jesse Buch, Ramaswamy Chandrashekar, Breanna Scorza, Grant Brown, Jacob J. Oleson, Christine A. Petersen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 7 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,420,077
of 18,523,374 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#508
of 4,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,925
of 296,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,523,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them