You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cross-sectional analysis of falsified, counterfeit and substandard medicines in a low-middle income country
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-08897-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daariimaa Khurelbat, Gereltuya Dorj, Bruce Sunderland, Tsetsegmaa Sanjjav, Enkhtuul Bayarsaikhan, Davaadagva Damdinjav, Gantuya Dorj, Altantuya Jigjidsuren, Oyun Lkhagvasuren, Baasandorj Erdenetsetseg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mongolia | 5 | 19% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Nepal | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 85% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,116,078
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,200
of 15,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,526
of 391,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.