↓ Skip to main content

Performance of criteria for selecting evolutionary models in phylogenetics: a comprehensive study based on simulated datasets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of criteria for selecting evolutionary models in phylogenetics: a comprehensive study based on simulated datasets
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arong Luo, Huijie Qiao, Yanzhou Zhang, Weifeng Shi, Simon YW Ho, Weijun Xu, Aibing Zhang, Chaodong Zhu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 3%
United States 4 2%
Spain 2 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 232 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 24%
Researcher 43 17%
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 27 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 14%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 30 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,372,943
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,381
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,000
of 104,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#21
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.