You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence'
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-9-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracy Merlin, Adele Weston, Rebecca Tooher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 276 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 22% |
| Researcher | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 21% |
| Unknown | 53 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#18,375,478
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,733
of 2,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,632
of 112,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.