You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The SHED-IT community trial study protocol: a randomised controlled trial of weight loss programs for overweight and obese men
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-701 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philip J Morgan, Clare E Collins, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Patrick McElduff, Tracy Burrows, Janet M Warren, Myles D Young, Nina Berry, Kristen L Saunders, Elroy J Aguiar, Robin Callister |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 385 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 77 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 16% |
Researcher | 54 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 51 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 7% |
Other | 59 | 15% |
Unknown | 68 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 14% |
Psychology | 46 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 38 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 34 | 9% |
Other | 52 | 13% |
Unknown | 89 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,712,760
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,115
of 14,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,066
of 87,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#19
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.