↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
474 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-8-277
Pubmed ID
Authors

John P Hirdes, Gunnar Ljunggren, John N Morris, Dinnus HM Frijters, Harriet Finne Soveri, Len Gray, Magnus Björkgren, Reudi Gilgen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 231 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 20%
Researcher 47 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Professor 17 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 39 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 13%
Social Sciences 28 11%
Psychology 24 10%
Computer Science 15 6%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 57 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,448
of 8,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,768
of 188,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#25
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.