↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of mobility instruments and their measurement properties for older acute medical patients

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of mobility instruments and their measurement properties for older acute medical patients
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-6-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie A de Morton, David J Berlowitz, Jennifer L Keating

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Ireland 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 172 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 26%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 27%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 7 4%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,313,804
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#688
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,131
of 97,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.