↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound guided injection of dexamethasone versus placebo for treatment of plantar fasciitis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasound guided injection of dexamethasone versus placebo for treatment of plantar fasciitis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-3-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew M McMillan, Karl B Landorf, Mark F Gilheany, Adam R Bird, Adam D Morrow, Hylton B Menz

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 15%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Sports and Recreations 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,587,747
of 21,007,539 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#477
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,159
of 280,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,007,539 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them