You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A digital decision support system (selfBACK) for improved self-management of low back pain: a pilot study with 6-week follow-up
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00604-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Louise Fleng Sandal, Cecilie K. Øverås, Anne Lovise Nordstoga, Karen Wood, Kerstin Bach, Jan Hartvigsen, Karen Søgaard, Paul Jarle Mork |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 6 | 17% |
Canada | 4 | 11% |
Denmark | 3 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 47% |
Scientists | 17 | 47% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
Researcher | 11 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
Other | 44 | 26% |
Unknown | 61 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 16% |
Engineering | 9 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 13% |
Unknown | 66 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,449,731
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#50
of 1,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,597
of 395,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.