↓ Skip to main content

A digital decision support system (selfBACK) for improved self-management of low back pain: a pilot study with 6-week follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,178)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A digital decision support system (selfBACK) for improved self-management of low back pain: a pilot study with 6-week follow-up
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40814-020-00604-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Fleng Sandal, Cecilie K. Øverås, Anne Lovise Nordstoga, Karen Wood, Kerstin Bach, Jan Hartvigsen, Karen Søgaard, Paul Jarle Mork

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Master 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 44 26%
Unknown 61 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 33 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 16%
Engineering 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Unspecified 6 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 66 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,449,731
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#50
of 1,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,597
of 395,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.