↓ Skip to main content

A debate on current eating disorder diagnoses in light of neurobiological findings: is it time for a spectrum model?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A debate on current eating disorder diagnoses in light of neurobiological findings: is it time for a spectrum model?
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha Jane Brooks, Mathias Rask-Andersen, Christian Benedict, Helgi Birgir Schiöth

Abstract

Sixty percent of eating disorders do not meet criteria for anorexia- or bulimia nervosa, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version 4 (DSM-IV). Instead they are diagnosed as 'eating disorders not otherwise specified' (EDNOS). Discrepancies between criteria and clinical reality currently hampering eating disorder diagnoses in the DSM-IV will be addressed by the forthcoming DSM-V. However, future diagnoses for eating disorders will rely on current advances in the fields of neuroimaging and genetics for classification of symptoms that will ultimately improve treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 260 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 18%
Student > Master 41 15%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 60 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 17%
Neuroscience 19 7%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 71 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,911,199
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#675
of 5,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,112
of 178,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#7
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.