↓ Skip to main content

Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-00984-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasmin Zähringer, Lukas Schwingshackl, Ani Movsisyan, Jan M. Stratil, Sara Capacci, Jürgen M. Steinacker, Sarah Forberger, Wolfgang Ahrens, Daniela Küllenberg de Gaudry, Holger J. Schünemann, Joerg J. Meerpohl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 25 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 28 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,330,150
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,009
of 1,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,307
of 425,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#25
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.