You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13014-020-01570-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eren Celik, Wolfgang Baus, Christian Baues, Wolfgang Schröder, Alessandro Clivio, Antonella Fogliata, Marta Scorsetti, Simone Marnitz, Luca Cozzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#13,483,677
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#616
of 2,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,309
of 392,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#19
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.