You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bear bile use at the intersection of maternal health in Cambodia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-020-00380-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Oneita Davis, Mhairi Gibson, Thona Lim, Jenny Anne Glikman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#868,842
of 25,019,915 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#15
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,741
of 397,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.