| Title |
Early awake prone position combined with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in severe COVID-19: a case series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02991-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiancheng Xu, Tao Wang, Xuemei Qin, Yanli Jie, Lei Zha, Weihua Lu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 27% |
| Mexico | 9 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Congo | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 251 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 80 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 89 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2021.
All research outputs
#617,307
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#402
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,124
of 427,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#16
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.