You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing low-value nursing procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-00995-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tessa Rietbergen, Denise Spoon, Anja H. Brunsveld-Reinders, Jan W. Schoones, Anita Huis, Maud Heinen, Anke Persoon, Monique van Dijk, Hester Vermeulen, Erwin Ista, Leti van Bodegom-Vos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 18% |
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 50% |
| Scientists | 12 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,721,637
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#309
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,292
of 429,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.