You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinicians’ attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-00991-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mia Bierbaum, Frances Rapport, Gaston Arnolda, Brona Nic Giolla Easpaig, Klay Lamprell, Karen Hutchinson, Geoff P. Delaney, Winston Liauw, Richard Kefford, Ian Olver, Jeffrey Braithwaite |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 27% |
| Japan | 2 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,666,439
of 25,362,919 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#306
of 1,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,903
of 429,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.