You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Theoretical and methodological considerations in evaluating large-scale health information technology change programmes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-020-05355-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathrin Cresswell, Aziz Sheikh, Bryony Dean Franklin, Marta Krasuska, Hung The Nguyen, Susan Hinder, Wendy Lane, Hajar Mozaffar, Kathy Mason, Sally Eason, Henry W. W. Potts, Robin Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 67% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,149,936
of 24,996,701 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,394
of 8,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,193
of 400,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#45
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,996,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.