↓ Skip to main content

Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
69 X users
reddit
3 Redditors
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
328 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
446 Mendeley
Title
Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank
Published in
BMC Medicine, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01640-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire L. Niedzwiedz, Catherine A. O’Donnell, Bhautesh Dinesh Jani, Evangelia Demou, Frederick K. Ho, Carlos Celis-Morales, Barbara I. Nicholl, Frances S. Mair, Paul Welsh, Naveed Sattar, Jill P. Pell, S. Vittal Katikireddi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 446 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 63 14%
Researcher 62 14%
Student > Master 54 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Other 22 5%
Other 63 14%
Unknown 145 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 22%
Social Sciences 33 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Other 83 19%
Unknown 168 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#200,587
of 24,917,903 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#172
of 3,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,465
of 402,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,917,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.