Evidence of unexplained discrepancies between planned and conducted statistical analyses: a review of randomised trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, May 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 82 X posts from 60 X users, with an upper bound of 238,661 followers.

RT @Brennan_Kahan: This is great news. In 15% of RCTs we reviewed, we couldn't understand what statistical methods were used for the prim…

RT @Brennan_Kahan: This is great news. In 15% of RCTs we reviewed, we couldn't understand what statistical methods were used for the prim…

RT @Brennan_Kahan: This is great news. In 15% of RCTs we reviewed, we couldn't understand what statistical methods were used for the prim…

RT @Brennan_Kahan: This is great news. In 15% of RCTs we reviewed, we couldn't understand what statistical methods were used for the prim…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 78 additional X posts.