You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The strategies that peanut and nut‐allergic consumers employ to remain safe when travelling abroad
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-2-12 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julie Barnett, Neil Botting, M Hazel Gowland, Jane S Lucas |
Abstract |
An understanding of the management strategies used by food allergic individuals is needed as a prerequisite to improving avoidance and enhancing quality of life. Travel abroad is a high risk time for severe and fatal food allergic reactions, but there is paucity of research concerning foreign travel. This study is the first to investigate the experiences of, and strategies used by peanut and tree nut allergic individuals when travelling abroad. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
Australia | 3 | 15% |
United States | 2 | 10% |
Argentina | 1 | 5% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Finland | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Psychology | 5 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,931,492
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#93
of 685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,084
of 165,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.