↓ Skip to main content

The strategies that peanut and nut‐allergic consumers employ to remain safe when travelling abroad

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The strategies that peanut and nut‐allergic consumers employ to remain safe when travelling abroad
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-2-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Barnett, Neil Botting, M Hazel Gowland, Jane S Lucas

Abstract

An understanding of the management strategies used by food allergic individuals is needed as a prerequisite to improving avoidance and enhancing quality of life. Travel abroad is a high risk time for severe and fatal food allergic reactions, but there is paucity of research concerning foreign travel. This study is the first to investigate the experiences of, and strategies used by peanut and tree nut allergic individuals when travelling abroad.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 39%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,459,411
of 21,294,325 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#55
of 619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,740
of 142,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,294,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them