↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetics and obesity: the devil is in the details

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenetics and obesity: the devil is in the details
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-8-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul W Franks, Charlotte Ling

Abstract

Obesity is a complex disease with multiple well-defined risk factors. Nevertheless, susceptibility to obesity and its sequelae within obesogenic environments varies greatly from one person to the next, suggesting a role for gene × environment interactions in the etiology of the disorder. Epigenetic regulation of the human genome provides a putative mechanism by which specific environmental exposures convey risk for obesity and other human diseases and is one possible mechanism that underlies the gene × environment/treatment interactions observed in epidemiological studies and clinical trials. A study published in BMC Medicine this month by Wang et al. reports on an examination of DNA methylation in peripheral blood leukocytes of lean and obese adolescents, comparing methylation patterns between the two groups. The authors identified two genes that were differentially methylated, both of which have roles in immune function. Here we overview the findings from this study in the context of those emerging from other recent genetic and epigenetic studies, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the study and speculate on the future of epigenetics in chronic disease research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 170 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Master 19 10%
Professor 14 7%
Other 45 24%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 29 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2012.
All research outputs
#3,234,991
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,845
of 3,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,143
of 181,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.