↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and management of invasive candidiasis in the ICU: an updated approach to an old enemy

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
64 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis and management of invasive candidiasis in the ICU: an updated approach to an old enemy
Published in
Critical Care, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1313-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thierry Calandra, Jason A. Roberts, Massimo Antonelli, Matteo Bassetti, Jean-Louis Vincent

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections, particularly those caused by Candida species, are not uncommon in critically ill patients and are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis and management of these infections can be challenging. In this review, we will briefly discuss recent epidemiological data on invasive candidiasis and current diagnostic approaches before concentrating on antifungal treatments.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 41 24%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 47%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 25 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2017.
All research outputs
#642,577
of 17,391,055 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#536
of 5,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,180
of 273,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,391,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.