You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis and management of invasive candidiasis in the ICU: an updated approach to an old enemy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1313-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thierry Calandra, Jason A. Roberts, Massimo Antonelli, Matteo Bassetti, Jean-Louis Vincent |
| Abstract |
Invasive fungal infections, particularly those caused by Candida species, are not uncommon in critically ill patients and are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis and management of these infections can be challenging. In this review, we will briefly discuss recent epidemiological data on invasive candidiasis and current diagnostic approaches before concentrating on antifungal treatments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 9% |
| Mexico | 5 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 54 | 23% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 44% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 24 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2017.
All research outputs
#887,494
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#703
of 6,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,976
of 393,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#60
of 591 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 591 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.