↓ Skip to main content

History and status quo of higher public health education in China

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
History and status quo of higher public health education in China
Published in
Public Health Reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40985-020-00120-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Jin, Guoqiang Dong, Liling Zou, Xiaobing Shen, Dongmei Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Philosophy 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,602,824
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#143
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,488
of 433,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.