You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pregnancy outcomes and risk of placental malaria after artemisinin-based and quinine-based treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy: a WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01592-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Makoto Saito, Rashid Mansoor, Kalynn Kennon, Anupkumar R. Anvikar, Elizabeth A. Ashley, Daniel Chandramohan, Lauren M. Cohee, Umberto D’Alessandro, Blaise Genton, Mary Ellen Gilder, Elizabeth Juma, Linda Kalilani-Phiri, Irene Kuepfer, Miriam K. Laufer, Khin Maung Lwin, Steven R. Meshnick, Dominic Mosha, Atis Muehlenbachs, Victor Mwapasa, Norah Mwebaza, Michael Nambozi, Jean-Louis A. Ndiaye, François Nosten, Myaing Nyunt, Bernhards Ogutu, Sunil Parikh, Moo Kho Paw, Aung Pyae Phyo, Mupawjay Pimanpanarak, Patrice Piola, Marcus J. Rijken, Kanlaya Sriprawat, Harry K. Tagbor, Joel Tarning, Halidou Tinto, Innocent Valéa, Neena Valecha, Nicholas J. White, Jacher Wiladphaingern, Kasia Stepniewska, Rose McGready, Philippe J. Guérin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| Kenya | 2 | 11% |
| India | 2 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Design | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,860,549
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,708
of 3,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,280
of 398,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#65
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.