↓ Skip to main content

Minimally invasive laparoscopic and robot-assisted emergency treatment of strangulated giant hiatal hernias: report of five cases and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimally invasive laparoscopic and robot-assisted emergency treatment of strangulated giant hiatal hernias: report of five cases and literature review
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13017-020-00316-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graziano Ceccarelli, Alessandro Pasculli, Walter Bugiantella, Michele De Rosa, Fausto Catena, Fabio Rondelli, Gianluca Costa, Aldo Rocca, Mattia Longaroni, Mario Testini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 20 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 28 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,484,106
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#274
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,551
of 397,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.