You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of gender in monocrotaline and chronic hypoxia induced pulmonary hypertension in obese rats and mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12931-020-01394-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Balram Neupane, Akylbek Sydykov, Kabita Pradhan, Christina Vroom, Christiane Herden, Srikanth Karnati, Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani, Sergey Avdeev, Süleyman Ergün, Ralph Theo Schermuly, Djuro Kosanovic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,751,285
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,762
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,434
of 433,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#43
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.