↓ Skip to main content

Current practice in analysing and reporting binary outcome data—a review of randomised controlled trial reports

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current practice in analysing and reporting binary outcome data—a review of randomised controlled trial reports
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01598-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ines Rombach, Ruth Knight, Nicholas Peckham, Jamie R. Stokes, Jonathan A. Cook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,131,212
of 25,330,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#807
of 3,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,362
of 405,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#30
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,330,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.