You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Coping with continuous human disturbance in the wild: insights from penguin heart rate response to various stressors
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6785-12-10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vincent A Viblanc, Andrew D Smith, Benoit Gineste, René Groscolas |
Abstract |
A central question for ecologists is the extent to which anthropogenic disturbances (e.g. tourism) might impact wildlife and affect the systems under study. From a research perspective, identifying the effects of human disturbance caused by research-related activities is crucial in order to understand and account for potential biases and derive appropriate conclusions from the data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Nigeria | 1 | 8% |
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Colombia | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 19% |
Researcher | 22 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 13% |
Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 43% |
Environmental Science | 29 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
Psychology | 2 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 6% |
Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2014.
All research outputs
#399,713
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#87
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,848
of 178,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.