↓ Skip to main content

Infrapatellar fat pad in the knee: is local fat good or bad for knee osteoarthritis?

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Infrapatellar fat pad in the knee: is local fat good or bad for knee osteoarthritis?
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/ar4607
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weiyu Han, Shiji Cai, Zhenhua Liu, Xingzhong Jin, Xia Wang, Benny Antony, Yuelong Cao, Dawn Aitken, Flavia Cicuttini, Graeme Jones, Changhai Ding

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Unknown 103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,814
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,615
of 240,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#32
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.