↓ Skip to main content

Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: determining patient-centered research priorities

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: determining patient-centered research priorities
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40900-020-00192-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason M. Beneciuk, Dorothy Verstandig, Chuck Taylor, Doug Scott, Joan Levin, Raine Osborne, Joel E. Bialosky, Trevor A. Lentz, Tava Buck, Anita L. Davis, Christina Harder, Monika B. Beneciuk, Virgil Wittmer, James Sylvester, Robert Rowe, David McInnes, Tad P. Fisher, Lisa McGarrie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,612,741
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#363
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,546
of 397,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#26
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.