↓ Skip to main content

Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: determining patient-centered research priorities

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: determining patient-centered research priorities
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40900-020-00192-8
Authors

Jason M. Beneciuk, Dorothy Verstandig, Chuck Taylor, Doug Scott, Joan Levin, Raine Osborne, Joel E. Bialosky, Trevor A. Lentz, Tava Buck, Anita L. Davis, Christina Harder, Monika B. Beneciuk, Virgil Wittmer, James Sylvester, Robert Rowe, David McInnes, Tad P. Fisher, Lisa McGarrie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 3 23%
Other 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Energy 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 3 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#10,435,763
of 16,343,687 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#220
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,874
of 290,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,343,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them