You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors predicting doctors’ reporting of performance change in response to multisource feedback
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-12-52 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karlijn Overeem, Hub C Wollersheimh, Onyebuchi A Arah, Juliette K Cruijsberg, Richard PTM Grol, Kiki MJMH Lombarts |
Abstract |
Multi-source feedback (MSF) offers doctors feedback on their performance from peers (medical colleagues), coworkers and patients. Researchers increasingly point to the fact that only a small majority of doctors (60-70 percent) benefit from MSF. Building on medical education and social psychology literature, the authors identified several factors that may influence change in response to MSF. Subsequently, they quantitatively studied the factors that advance the use of MSF for practice change. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 38% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 49% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,444,663
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#398
of 3,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,419
of 164,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.