↓ Skip to main content

The Mechanism and Clinical Outcome of patients with Corona Virus Disease 2019 Whose Nucleic Acid Test has changed from negative to positive, and the therapeutic efficacy of Favipiravir: A structured…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
Title
The Mechanism and Clinical Outcome of patients with Corona Virus Disease 2019 Whose Nucleic Acid Test has changed from negative to positive, and the therapeutic efficacy of Favipiravir: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-04430-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiawen Li, Chi Zhang, Zhao Wu, Guiqiang Wang, Hong Zhao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 291 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Master 28 10%
Other 19 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 60 21%
Unknown 103 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Psychology 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 118 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,828,902
of 21,770,930 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,481
of 5,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,008
of 306,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,770,930 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them