↓ Skip to main content

The association between state bans on soda only and adolescent substitution with other sugar-sweetened beverages: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The association between state bans on soda only and adolescent substitution with other sugar-sweetened beverages: a cross-sectional study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-12-s1-s7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel R Taber, Jamie F Chriqui, Renee Vuillaume, Steven H Kelder, Frank J Chaloupka

Abstract

Across the United States, many states have actively banned the sale of soda in high schools, and evidence suggests that students' in-school access to soda has declined as a result. However, schools may be substituting soda with other sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and national trends indicate that adolescents are consuming more sports drinks and energy drinks. This study examined whether students consumed more non-soda SSBs in states that banned the sale of soda in school.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 30 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 36 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,004,472
of 24,010,679 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,044
of 2,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,253
of 266,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#25
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,010,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.