↓ Skip to main content

Systemic hypoferremia and severity of hypoxemic respiratory failure in COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Systemic hypoferremia and severity of hypoxemic respiratory failure in COVID-19
Published in
Critical Care, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03051-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akshay Shah, Joe N. Frost, Louise Aaron, Killian Donovan, Hal Drakesmith, Stuart R. McKechnie, Simon J. Stanworth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Other 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 31 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,085,582
of 20,531,205 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#980
of 5,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,652
of 303,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,531,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them