You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-020-05356-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yick Ting A Kwok, Alastair PY Mah, Katherine MC Pang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 38% |
| South Africa | 2 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,265,806
of 25,155,561 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,456
of 8,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,052
of 404,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#49
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,155,561 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.